Question:
Let's Say I'm Going to the US for College, and After that I Wanted to Live There...?
Kwassa Kwassa
2007-10-03 23:30:12 UTC
Exactly, I'm about to finish my last year in high school and I can get a scholarship. If I go to the US, is it possible to live there after the 5 years I've spent getting my degree (including my first year I'll spend in an English institute)? Am I having a better chance now that I've got a degree in engineering or accounting or whatever it is to get an American citizenship. Will I be able to get an American passport?

I'm just asking out of curiosity if things continue to get worse here like always.
Eight answers:
anyusmoon1
2007-10-04 00:26:36 UTC
Curiosity???? Get a grip on how important US sovereignty is to the US population then decide. If i were to answer without any restrictions I'd say... stay where you are. We don't want anyone else here that can't site the constitutionally mandated principles that make up the US.



STAY HOME.



Thanks
mikeinportc
2007-10-03 23:37:44 UTC
Five years is a long time . Hard to say what the situation will be (politically). If you have an engineering degree , or something in computer science/programming, or related , your chances will be better. We don't produce enough of those professions to meet demand. Where are you from, btw? (Doesn't matter, just curious)Good Luck .





ps ".....With an engineering degree you won't have any trouble getting an H1 visa after you finish your degree......".



People are having trouble with that right now . Microsoft is setting up a facility in Vancouver , because of that . But in 5 yrs , the situation might be different. Plus, if you are already here , it couldn't hurt . (Unless you are Iraqi, in which case they have to leave as soon as they graduate . Have to pretend everything is just perfect there . Again, that will probably change in 5 yrs)
2007-10-03 23:36:04 UTC
With an engineering degree you won't have any trouble getting an H1 visa after you finish your degree. Once you get that far and start interviewing companies for a job, make sure the company agrees, in writing, to immediately start the permanent residence process. That way, after working for them on an H1 for 3 year or so you'll be able to get PR status. Then you just have to stay on track, don't get into trouble and a few years later you can apply for citizenship.



Good luck!
2007-10-04 00:53:05 UTC
Many students do this. The process is as follows:



You come to the US on a student visa and complete your education.

While you are in school, you apply for a work visa so you can work once you graduate.

Once you have a steady job, you apply for permanent residency.

After you have permanent residency for 5 years, you apply for citizenship.
Sandy B
2007-10-04 00:26:18 UTC
well....your not a citizen....you have to call the INS and ask how it works exactly...i ''think'' you can apply for an adjustment of status for the time being in college....to become elgible for a passport and stuff you need to live there for 7 year i ''Think'' I am not sure but call the INS and dont ask that kinda question in yahoo answers....only a real professional will be able to help you with this question...you can also email at www.INS.com
Lori K
2007-10-04 02:40:58 UTC
The more education you have, the better your chances. It's easier for an engineer to come to the US than an accountant. Companies are more likely to sponsor an engineer.
teomabanta
2007-10-03 23:38:05 UTC
you need to be an immigrant to stay in the U.S.



talk to the immigrations.
2007-10-03 23:58:32 UTC
If you live outside of America or the United States and want to get citizenship you will only become a United States citizen NOT a American Citizen.



American Citizens are born in America NOT the United States, those born in the United States are US citizens those stupid people born in America and gave up their Rights to become US citizens by getting a Social Security number are now US citizens.



Because they don't understand that the Social Security number is voluntary when you call the Social Security office and ask is this voluntary to get the number, they will say: "Yes, it is voluntary, but you can't get a job in the United States without it."



They are only using proper English. They are talking only about the United Sates also known as the District of Columbia.



More info below:



Could You Be A Nonresident Alien?



The "Word" Game Words, Terms and Phrases Used by Those Who Write the Laws to Keep You Confused and Off Balance!



"Congress may provide its own definition for the terms used. The student should be aware of a number of general definitions contained in I.R.C. (26 U.S.C.A.) Section 7701." Malat v. Riddell, supra page 666.



Protected by Common Law Copyright © Wake Up America. The author explicitly reserves all rights herein and here-out, "without prejudice." Permission will be granted to copy with a written request for non-profit purposes only.



Compliments of: www.WakeUpAmerica.info Under Construction.



Are you a citizen of District of Columbia, the Corporate United States?



The odds are in my favor that you’ll say no to that question. SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!



Question; What is the difference between the two terms below?



1. united States 2. United States



If you look at the Constitution, you will find that these two terms are used throughout. The 55 singers used nothing more than proper English in the creation of the Constitution and other writings of their time.



The number one "united" is a common noun and the number two "United" is a proper noun. Meaning #1 refers to all the 50 States.



It must be determined which UNITED is used when reviewing any Federal law. As UNITED is used in the context of the article, and in other Federal laws, the term is used as a proper noun. When the fifty States are included in Federal law, in all cases, one of the following terms will be used: The 50 States, the several States, “these” united States and America. The 50 States are nowhere to be found under any section of "Subtitle A, Section 1 Income Tax Law." See descriptive chart at the back of this booklet on the TWO UNITED STATES for a further explanation.



If you have filed a United States Individual Income Tax Return, 1040 Form, you have stated, under penalties of perjury, that you are "a citizen of the District of Columbia," the corporate United States.



You say that can’t be true, Read on, and I will prove that you probably entered into your first contract/agreement with the Federal government when you signed the SS-5 Form. By doing so, you made an election to be a "citizen of the District of Columbia," the United States.



Are you planing to file a "U.S. Individual Income Tax Return" for the Federal tax year just ending? If you are, you will be making an election to further ratify that you are a "citizen of the District of Columbia," the " United States," a "state," or a "foreign nation" with respect to the 50 States for Federal taxing and jurisdictional purposes.



If you reside in the "District of Columbia" or any of its possessions (Guam, Puerto Rico, The Virgin Island, or America Samoa, etc.), or work directly for its instrumentalities (agencies of the Federal Government), you are most likely required to file a form known as the 1040. You would be required to file, because you would be directly receiving "income" from a source within its political and legislative jurisdiction (Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 17 & 18 U.S. Constitution). This being the case, the Federal taxing statues and their regulations would apply. However, if you are from one of the 50 States, also known as the Republic States of the Union, chances are you were never required to file a 1040 Form. If you have never received "income" directly connected to a "trade or business" to or from the Federal government, chances are you may have paid some Federal taxes that were not required by law to be paid.



When I learned this information for the first time, I had to ask myself to basic questions: "Do the laws of the State next door, or any of the other 49 States, for that matter, apply to me?"



The answer was obviously "no". My next question was, "Do the laws of a foreign state, country, or nation have political or legislative jurisdiction over me as a foreign individual?" I wanted to understand how the tax laws, rules, and regulation, of the United States, the District of Columbia, a foreign country, applied to me.



Have you ever heard of anyone being cited for a violation of law, by a foreign government?



If another Union State attempted to cite you for a traffic ticket or a violation of their laws while you are not within their borders, they would be overstepping their lawful jurisdiction. If you challenged their unlawful jurisdiction as a foreign individual (nonresident alien) to their State, the case should be thrown out of court. The laws of another State (foreign State), nation, or country would not apply, unless you have granted them jurisdiction. The most common way an individual grants jurisdiction is by entering into a contract and/or an agreement by signing on the dotted line. Your signature would grant the foreign power jurisdiction over you.



You are probably asking at this point, "ow is all this information going to help me and my family?"



Read on, and perhaps you may take some of this information to the bank ( just a figure of speech, don’t take it literally). The information in this booklet can and will save you BIG dollars, once you understand and correct the public record, regarding your true and lawful status.



If you have filed a 1040 Form, you did in fact, declare you were a citizen of a foreign country. That foreign country is Washington, D.C., also known as the "District of Columbia." How does one become a citizen of another country? In simple terms, by request and your signature. Taking a closer look, however, it started back in 1868, under the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution. I won’t quote the Amendment here; however I do recommend you look it up for yourself. Under the 14th Amendment, a new type of citizen was created.



Prior to the 14th Amendment, this type of citizen did not exist. The 13th Amendment to the Federal Constitution freed the black people from slavery. In the 14th Amendment, it granted citizenship to the black people, and to corporations, otherwise known as "persons". A review of the word "citizen," is a must in understanding your true and correct status, regarding your relationship to the Federal government.



For clarification to you, the reader, I will only be talking about Federal tax law and how those laws apply to an American "nonresident" outside the political and legislative jurisdiction of the United States Congress. When I make reference to the United States, I am referring to legislative and political jurisdiction only. Neither the term "within" nor "without" has anything to do with "territory," within the context of this booklet.



Having said that, if you heard me refer to another State of the Union as a foreign country, you would probably think I was very strange. In fact, all of the fifty States are foreign with respect to each other, just as the District of Columbia is foreign with respect to each of the fifty States. When the Constitution was ratified over two hundred years ago, this great document created a new "Nation" called the United States. It did not create the "Union."



If you look at the Preamble to the United States Constitution, you will note that it states: "to form a more perfect Union." The States had already formed a Union amongst themselves under the Articles of Confederation. They did not need to form another Union. I would encourage every reader to review the documents that created America and the "United States." The more you learn, the more you will understand the legislative "and political jurisdiction of the Federal government, i.e. how the "Congress of the United States" applies or does not apply to you and your family. The Constitution is nothing more than a contract, signed by fifty-five signers, who wanted to create a new "Nation" called the United States, also known as the District of Columbia.



The Constitution gave this "Nation" exclusive jurisdiction and law-making powers over the ten square miles of the District and all places it purchased. This is found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.



It is imperative that the reader understands that the Federal government has never had exclusive Constitutional, legislative, or political jurisdiction outside of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17. I will attempt to put forth, in a step-by-step fashion, the meaning of some of the words, terms, and phrases as used in the Federal tax laws of the United States. Before I define "citizen," let’s review a few other words, terms and phrases, first, to help you better understand the subject matter being discussed here.



Author’s note: Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, is the most commonly used law Dictionary in the legal field today. I will use this dictionary to define most of the words, terms, and phrases that follow. I will use Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930 Edition, for comparison in some cases. The other reference materials will be the United States Code, Title 26, (USC), also known as the Internal Revenue Code, Words and Phrases, Permanent Edition, 1658 to Date, and the Wiley Law Publication. I will be repetitive with some of the words herein, starting with the word "State." It is important to understand how these words, terms, and phrases are used in different situations of law.



"State" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1407, (page numbers vary from one edition to the next). "Term may refer either to body politic of a nation (e.g. California)." Union State: One of the component commonwealths or states of the United States of America." Federal state: "Any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession subject to the legislative authority of the United States." Note that Union States are not subject to the authority of the United States.



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 7 "The word "state" has two meanings, and is used in both of them in the Constitution, in different parts of that instrument, in one sense it signifies the territory inhabited by the people; in the other, it means the body politic inhabiting the territory... As the purpose of the Constitution is to establish the principles of government for the community as a body politic, without any particular reference to the territory which they inhabit, the primary and leading sense in which the term "state" is used is that of the body politic." State v. Wilmington City Council, Dell, 3 Har. 294.299.



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 11. The term "state," when used in the Constitution of the United States, is confined to a part of the American confederacy, and does not embrace a territory of the United States. Seton v. Hanham, Ga. R.M. Charlt. 374. Emphasis the author’s Here, the phrase " of the United States" means "belonging to the United States".



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 11. The District of Columbia and the territories are "states" as that word is used in treaties with foreign powers, with respect to the ownership, disposition, and inheritance of property. Downes v. Bidwell, 21 S. Ct. 770, 780, 182, U.S. 244, 45 L. Ed. 1088



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 18. A "state" or "nation" denotes a political community organized under a distinct government recognized and confirmed by its citizens and subjects as a supreme power. The Lucy H., D. C, Fla,. 235F. 610.612.



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 11 and 12. A citizen of the District of Columbia is not a citizen of a "state" within the meaning of Constitutional provision that the judicial power of the United States shall extend to controversies between citizens of different states. Wilson v. Guggenheim, D.C.S.C., 70 F. Supp. 417, 418.



"State" - Words and Phrases, page 12. The "state" being an independent sovereignty within its sphere makes its own constitution and laws, creates its own courts and fixes their jurisdiction, while a "territory" being a political dependency under the absolute control and dominion of Congress, its organic law is made by Congress and its courts and their jurisdiction and procedure are defined by the same power." Makainai v. Goo Wan Hoy, 14 Haw. 607.



"United States" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1533. "This term has several meanings. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in family of nations..." This means the United States is a foreign country with respect to the 50 States of the Union.



"Foreign" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 646. "Belonging to another nation or country...or rendered in another state or jurisdiction... nonresident, person or corporation..., etc."



"Foreign State" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1407. "A foreign country or nation. The several united States are considered "foreign" to each other..."



"Foreign States" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 648. "Nations which are outside the United States... one state of the Union is foreign to another."



"Foreign Jurisdiction" - Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930 Edition. "A jurisdiction other than of that forum."



"Foreign Laws" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 647. "...a place of jurisdiction."



"Forum Contractus" - Black’s Law dictionary, 6th Edition, page 655. "The forum of the contract; the court of the place where a contract is made; the place where a contract is made, considered as a place of jurisdiction."



"Federal Government - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 695. "The government of the United States of America, as distinguished from the government of the several states."



Let’s look at the last term one more time. If you understand this last definition, then you will be on your way to understanding your true and correct status, in relation to the Federal government (Forum or Forum Contractus) of the United States. The definition stated, "The government of the United States of America, as distinguished from the government of the several states."



Wait a minute, "the government of the United States of America, as distinguished from the government of the several states." Yes, you did read it right. I’ll bet you thought, as I have in the past, that all the laws of the United States applied to you.



Think about all the laws passed by the United States Congress that you thought applied to you and the state you inhabit.



If you have elected to become a "citizen of the United States" or a "resident" thereof, then its laws, taxing authority, political and legislative jurisdiction would most definitely apply to you. However, if you are a "non-citizen", "nonresident alien" to the United States, the "state of the Forum" their laws would not apply. OK, let’s look at the word "citizen."



"Citizen" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 244. "One who, under the Constitution and laws of the United States, or of a particular state, is a member of the political community, owing allegiance and being entitled to the enjoyment of full civil rights."

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..."



"Citizenship" - Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930 Edition. "The privilege of membership in a political society, implying a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of society; the status of a citizen with its respective rights and duties. 3 Am J2d Aliens Sec. 115. Emphasis the author’s



"Citizen of U.S." - Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930 Edition. "A person born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction. 3 Am J2d Aliens Sec. 116.



Note that under the term "citizen of U.S.," it is a privilege to be a "citizen," not a right granted by your Creator, whoever that may be for you. Do you want to be a "citizen" of the United States subject to its political or legislative jurisdiction? Do you want to be a "subject," subject to its taxes? Let’s look at the definition of "subject: in Black’s Law Dictionary.



"Subject" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1425 and 1426. "One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws...as subjects they are bound to obey the law..." Note the next part of the definition. "...The term is little used, in this sense in countries enjoying a republican form of government." The 50 States are a republican form of government. It is interesting that the several states would not enter into or sign the Constitution of the United States, unless it guaranteed to the States a republican form of government. The several States never have had subjects.



However, the United States does have subjects, and the term "citizen" is synonymous with "subject." Again, I will ask you, "Do you want to be a citizen ’subject?"



For those of you who no longer want this title of "nobility" (and citizen is a title of "nobility") and want to take back your true and correct status, keep reading. For those of you who are happy with your status as a citizen/subject read no further.



Let’s continue with the words, terms, and phrases as used in law and the courts.



"Alien" - Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 71. "A foreign born person who has not qualified as a citizen of the country, but an alien is a person, within the meaning of the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution, to same extent as a citizen."



"Nonresident Alien" - Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930 Edition. "A person who is neither a citizen nor a resident of the country. An alien who does not reside within the State." Estate of Gill, 79 Iowa 296, 44 NW 553.



Have you ever considered yourself a "nonresident alien?" I am not talking about an illegal alien. I am talking about one who is foreign to the United States, or to a sister State of the Union. Not within the "state of the Forum," meaning you have no contract connecting you to their political or legislative jurisdiction.



Let’s look at the Federal Tax code, 26 USC, to see how all this applies to the "nonresident alien," an individual not within United States or its political or legislative jurisdiction, for taxing purposes.



"Nonresident alien" - 26 USC Section 7701(b)(1)(B), page 6870. "An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States..."



I have discovered, through my studies of the Federal Tax Code and its regulations, that an American born in one of the several States, a foreign state (country) with respect to the United States, is a "nonresident alien" with respect to the legislative and political jurisdiction of the United States, i.d. the jurisdiction of the Federal government. I signed an agreement known as the SS-5 Form, which put me into the "State of the Forum," their political and legislative jurisdiction.



To my knowledge, the SS-5 Form is the first form that I signed which connected me to the United States. The SS-5 Form, for those who do not remember, is the application (contract/agreement) for a Social Security number.



By entering this contract/agreement with the United States government, it changed my lawful status from a "nonresident alien" to a citizen/subject of the United States.



From that point forward, I was subject to the jurisdiction (State of the Forum) of the District of Columbia for taxing and identification purposes, anywhere around the world.



I was never told, when I entered into the SS-5 contract/agreement at the age of 15, that I would be entering into an "adhesion contract." I was not told it would subject me to the jurisdiction of the Federal government for the rest of my life. I was not told by signing this form that I would be giving up all my Rights under the united States of America Constitution and the Bill of Rights to become citizen/subjects or slaves under the United States and have no Rights but would rather have Privileges.



An "adhesion contract" is a contract that you must take or leave. You’re not allowed to make any changes to the contract. One example would be an insurance contract. If you tried to make a change to it, the insurance broker would tell you can’t do that. You take it or leave it. I was led to believe it was mandatory by law to apply for a Social Security number, before I could begin employment with my first job at the age of 15.



By entering this contract as a minor child. I waved my "nonresident alien" status, which unknowingly made me a citizen/subject of the United States.



I have since learned, through my studies of contract law, that the full terms of any contract and/or agreement must be disclosed in advance by the controlling party. Any time the full terms of a contract are not fully disclosed to the other party, it can be construed as an "unconscionable" contract. It could also be presumed that actual and/or constructive fraud was involved, purposely misleading the other party, if not disclosed.



Once issue of non-disclosure or possible fraud is brought to the attention of the controlling party, and the controlling party refuses to disclose the elements, or make the necessary corrections, the contract or agreement could be found null and void in a court of law. However, if you are aware of the fraud and do nothing about it, you agree to it. In my case, when signing the SS-5 contract/agreement, as a minor child, the government did not tell me I would be waving my true status.



They did not disclose that the Social Security number was voluntary, nor did they disclose that this would make me a "citizen/subject" of the United States.



It wasn’t until I was well into my adulthood, that I discovered that the SS-5 contract/agreement really did to change my true and lawful status, with respect to the United States. After further investigation, I also discovered I have been paying thousands and thousands of dollars in "Federal Income Taxes" I was never required to pay, under my true and correct status! Because I signed on the dotted line at age 15 (or some adult signed for me), I made myself liable for "U.S. Individual Income taxes" for over 25 years.



I have in my possession a letter from the Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security dated January 10, 1990, signed by Penny Payton, Claims Representative. Mrs. Pyton states, and I quote. "Social Security is a voluntary system in that no one is required to get a number/mark ... a person with no social security number would have no taxable income..."



A Social Security number is 100% voluntary for an American from one of the 50 States. As stated in the Payton quote above, a person with no social security number/mark would have no taxable income.



However, if you have received income from a source within effectively connected to the United States, you could have taxable income which would make you liable for the "Federal Income Tax."



Let’s take a closer look at the Federal Tax Code, 26 USC, to see how it applies to us Americans in the 50 States of the Union. You will see how they (the government) are using everyday common usage words to mean something different from what appears on the surface.



You should now have a better understanding of some of those words, terms, and phrases, as thy have been outlined. Here’s one more word that can mislead most Americans in business.



The term "trade or business;" You would think if you were involved in a "trade or business" as it applies in the Federal Tax code, it would mean any kind of trade or business, right? Wrong! Trade or Business as defined in 26 USC, Section 7701(a)(26) states: "The term "trade or business" includes the performance of the functions of a public office." Are you in a public office?



If you’re not, then you’re not in a "trade or business" for the purpose of the Federal Tax Code relating to that general definition. Watch out, however, their words, terms, and phrases can change, in meaning, from one statute (law) to the next.



Did you notice the word "includes" in the above definition? This is an important word used by governments all the time. Let’s see what this word means in law and how governments use it in their statutes (laws). Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, page 687., defines the term as follows: "To confine within, hold as in an enclosure, take in, attain, shut up, contain, enclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve." Meaning to confine or limit within the context of whatever is mentioned in the statue only.



Here’s another example of the word "includes" as used in Section 7701(a)(10) of 26 USC, the Internal Revenue Code. It states: "The term "State" shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title."



There can be no question that the word "include", as used in the above statute, means to contain, confine, and lock in.



It is well known, in law, that if something is not in the statue (law), it cannot be included in the statute. This means the term "State" is defined only as the District of Columbia in that statute, and nothing more.



You probably thought, as I did, it meant California, Utah, Nevada, etc. Let’s look at one more definition of the word "State".



This definition comes under "employment taxes" in Section 3121(c), of the Internal Revenue Code and used the word "includes" in the statute.



"State" - The term "State" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa." As you will note, this definition does not mention an of the 50 States as it dose under "Excise Taxes" in 26 USC, Section 4612, on crude oil. Therefore, under the above definition of "State" and that section of the Code, Americans from the 50 states would not be "included" according to the statue (law). Let me ask you a question: Are you or your employer within any of the above areas for "employment tax" purposes, according to the Internal Revenue Code?



Looking back at "trade or business," anything else but the performance of the functions of a public office. The "trade or business" you are in, I’ll bet, is not the function or the performance of a public office. Under "source of income" in 26 USC, 864(a)(b)(1) there is another definition of the term "trade or business." It refers to "nonresident aliens."



It states: "the term "trade or business within the United States" includes the performance of personal services within the United States at any time within taxable year, but does not include - The performance of personal services -- (A) for a nonresident alien individual, foreign partnership, or foreign corporation, not engaged in trade or business within the United States..."



You have probably concluded, by now, I do not consider myself a "citizen" or "resident" of the "United States" anymore, nor do I reside in a Federal "state" or have a "trade or business." I am not liable to file or pay any Federal Income Taxes on a 1040 Form. That Form applies to "United States citizens" and those who make an election to be in the "political and legislative" jurisdiction of the United States, their, "State of the Forum."



As a "nonresident alien" receiving "income" from a source within the United States, or subject to a "tax treaty" of a foreign country that would make me taxable, the proper Form for me to file would be a 1040NR. This being the case, I would be a "nonresident alien" during this taxable period.



Even if I were to reside within the United States, as a "resident alien," the first 70 thousand dollars I made, within the United States, would be exempt from Federal taxation. This is according to the Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service) Publication 515. Therefore, depending on your personal connection to and with the United States, this and this alone will dictate how their taxes would apply to you. Most everyone reading this article would have no taxable "income," even if they did receive "income" from within or connected to the United States.



From this point forward, we will review sections from the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Which interpret the Internal Revenue Code, sections and regulations listed below, you can decide whether or not you are an American "Nonresident Alien Nontaxpayer," who is taxable "only" on certain income from sources within the United States and on income derived from all sources, (including those sources without the United States), that are effectively connected to the United States, per 26 USC 864(c)(4).



This class of "Nonresident Alien" who has "NO INCOME" from sources within the United States, and is neither connected with any trade or business being conducted with any trade or business being conducted within or without the United States per 26 C.F.R. 1.871-1(b)(I)(ii)., 1.871-2(a)., and 1.871-4(b) is a "Nontaxpayer" and would have no taxable "income."



NONRESIDENT ALIENS never have self-employment income, 26 C.F.R. Section 1.1402(b)-3(d). For all of you who have been working for yourselves, surprise?



26 USC, Section 1-11402(c)(1) TRADE OR BUSINESS states that "for the purpose for the tax on self-employment income, shall have the same meaning as when used in section 162". This section refers to travel expenses of "elected officials" as employees of the Federal government 26 USC, Section 911.



26 C.F.R., Section 31.3401(a)(6)-1(b) "REMUNERATION FOR SERVICES PERFORMED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Remuneration paid to a nonresident alien individual for services performed outside the United States is excepted from wages and hence is not subject to withholding."



Congress has defined the "employee" found in 26 USC, Section 3401© in the Federal Register, Tuesday, Sept. 7, 1943, Section 404.104 under Employee, at page 12267 as follows:



"...The term ‘employee’ specifically includes officers and employees whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a state [meaning the Federal States as per 26 USC, Section 4262(c)(1) 1954 Code and 26 C.F.R., Section 31.3121(e)-1(a)(b), 26 USC, Section 3121(e)(1)] territory, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing." Federal Register, Section 404.104-9/7/1943. Emphasis added.



Americans born within one of the Republic states of the Union are of the "nonresident Alien Class" of Americans who qualify under the EXCLUSION section of 26 C.F.R., 301.6109-1(g) as follows:



"26 C.F.R., Section 301.6109-1(g) IDENTIFYING NUMBERS, NONRESIDENT ALIEN EXCLUSION. This section shall not apply to nonresident aliens, foreign corporation, foreign partnerships, or foreign private foundations that do not have income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States and do not have an office or place of business or a fiscal or paying agent in the United States." Emphasis added.



The "wages" received from the company you may be working for are for your personal service (your labor) and are not deemed as "INCOME" according to the Department of the Treasure (Internal Revenue Service).



"26 USC, Section 861(a)(3)(c)(I). INCOME FROM SOURCES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES: Personal Services. - For purpose of this part, Part 11, and Chapter 3, the term "trade or business within the United States " includes the performance of personal services within United States at any time within the taxable year, but does not include - performance of personal service for foreign employer. The foreign partnership or foreign corporation, not engaged in trade or business within the United States, or..." Emphasis added.



"26 C.F.R., Section 1.1441-3(a). EXCEPTIONS AND RULES OF SPECIAL APPLICATION. (a) Income from sources without the United States. -- to be extent that items of income constitute gross income from sources without the United States, they are not subject to withholding." Emphasis added.



"26 USC, Section 3401(a) WAGES.

For purposes of this chapter, the term "wages" means all remuneration for service performed by an employee for his employer, including the cash value of all remuneration paid in any medium other than cash; except that such term shall not include remuneration paid -- (6) for such services performed by a nonresident alien individual, as may be designated by regulations prescribed by the Secretary." Emphasis added.



The designation by regulation as prescribed by the Secretary is found under the exclusionary rule, "Identifying Numbers," at 26 C.F.R., Section 301.6109-1(g). Refer to page 30, "IDENTIFYING NUMBERS."



"We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be a citizen of the United States and a citizen of a state, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other. The duty of a government to afford protection is limited always by the power it possesses for that purpose. It can neither grant nor secure to its citizens any right or privilege not expressly or by implication placed under its jurisdiction." U.S. v. Cruikshank.,, 92 U.S. 542, 549, 550 and Twingin v. N.J., U.S. 78, 94, 98, 99, 110, 111, 112.



In my opinion, the term "citizen," as used in the quote above, can be synonymous with American. As an American you have the same protections and more, because you are not a subject.



In the Appellate court case below, which has never been overturned, has stated quite clearly:



"Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible, everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right; for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands." Helvering v. Gregory, F. 2d 809.



You are probably asking, "How can I use this new found information?" Well, for one, I would encourage you to verify all the information presented within this article at your local law library. See for yourself if what has been outlined is true. The author welcomes anyone to point out any errors and/or mistakes made throughout this booklet.



You are further encouraged to seek additional information from those familiar with the subject of political and legislative jurisdiction, and how it applies to one who is an American "nonresident alien," one who is outside the "state of the forum."



The author explicitly reserves all rights herein and here-out "Without Prejudice," under the Uniform Commercial Code, Article 1, Section 207.



See you at the law library!............



"Voluntarily" Doing what the opponents are incorrectly wanting. Each move with the Debit/Credit-Club (DC-CLUB) and it’s accomplices should be Lawfully be done under "TDC" (threat, duress, and/or coercion).



"Pleading" guilty or not guilty means that you’ll accept the verdict and grant jurisdiction. If you have been conned into the U.S. district court arena, remember that you’re in America, and can consider the opponent as being in "France".



"Flag" for America the beautiful meant Old Glory, and this is true. However the DC-CLUB made the jurisdictionally-foreign gold-fringed "EQUITY / ADMIRALTY" counterpart the official flag of its United States effective 7/4/1960 by President Eisenhower and with 1973's Nixon ordering it in all federal buildings. And in gross ignorance America’s once-free pastors buy it for offices and altars, along with their enslaving corporations



Here is a little more information on "LICENSES", which by Law are not to be required of "natural born free Citizens" unless they knowingly intelligently "volunteer". In our 1929 Iowa there were many working for profit in COMMERCIAL enterprises and minors were required to have a "license". A careful checking of any State’s Manuals in the Department of Motor Vehicles should verify this Law and Fact. But otherwise reminded such Citizens, and it wasn’t long before nearly all were renewing their licenses due to just plain ignorance and government FRAUD by concealment of the Law. Are many of us just creatures of habit?



THE STATE OWNS YOUR VEHICLE

It has been brought to my attention that the license plate sticker that you voluntarily put on your property has imbedded in the background "For Official Use Only". You have to look very hard to see it but it is there. Now every one knows that all municipal vehicles (City, County, State and Federal) all have the sign on the vehicle "For Official Use Only". This implies that the corporate state has an interest in your personal property.

I myself do not have plates on my personal property, but I do travel in it. I have a bill of sale and the MSO (Manufactory Statement of Origin) that this piece of machinery has been sold to me free nd clear with no other outside interest. The corporate state now has to prove that they have obtained an interest in my personal property.

The corporate state when a car is first sold, request that Original Certificate of Origin, either be distorted or forwarded to them. The purchaser is not to receive it. The corporate state then, has the purchaser sign a power of attorney over the vehicle to them. The state then, assigns a license number to theat item. Then the corporate state can control and tell everyone how to drive the state vehicle that the have leased for a yearly rental fee (an excise tax, commonly called registration fees).

If you read California Statutes, you will see that an individual who carries his own property, or travels for his own reasons and pleasure is exempt from such fees. The DMV Code is just an administrative interpretation of the Statute that created the code. The DMV Code is legally correct, the just do not tell the whole truth of the matter. The code is specifically written for commercial users. So, if you are leasing a vehicle, (remember that they have combined the terms "operator" and "driver" to mean the same thing).

A Citizen of one of the Several States, does have the absolute right to travel, this is unquestioned. But, an alien be it a citizen of Japan, Germany, or the District of Columbia, does not have this right, for them it is a privilege to travel, as the are outside the scoope of intent of the Original State and Federal Constitutions.

Now that you have this information, what are you going to do??? You have to decide who and what you are, the government assumes that you are an alien (citizen of the District of Columbia) as you have admitted such by obtaining a social security number, driver’s license, and registering you personal property. There are numerous other legal attachments that also entrap you, so as the highest court has stated... "Those that sleep on their rights, do not have any." For more information call the number printed at the first of this information under "Compliments of;".....



ZIP CODE USE INVOKES FEDERAL JURISDICTION!

Use of the ZIP Code is voluntary. See domestic Mail Services Regulations, Section 122.32. You should also know that the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the ZIP-Code. Postal Reorganization Act Section 403. (Public Law 91-375) The Federal government utilizes the ZIP code to prove that you reside in a "Federal district of the District of Columbia". This is why the IRS and other government agencies (state and federal) require a ZIP Code when they assert jurisdiction by sending you a letter. They claim that this speeds the mail, but this is a sly and subtle TRICK. It is also PRIMA FACIE evidence that you are a subject of Congress and a "citizen of the District of Columbia" who is "resident" in one of the several States.

The receipt of mail with a ZIP code is one of the requirements for the IRS to have jurisdiction to send you notices. The government cannot bill an American Citizen, as he is not within the purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the District of Columbia. In fact, the Internal Revenue has adopted the ZIP code areas as Internal Revenue Districts. See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday, March 19, 1986.

You must remember that the Postal Service is a private corporation, a quasi-governmental agency. It is no longer a full government agency. It is like the Federal Reserve System, The Internal Revenue Service and the United States Marshal Service. They are all outside the restrictions of the Federal Constitution, as private corporations. They are all powerful in their respective areas of responsibility to enforce collection for the federal debt. So, if you are using a ZIP code, you are in effect saying openly and notoriously that you do not live in the American Republic, but instead you are a resident in the "state" area of the District of Columbia (a federal district).

So you must be aware of the movement toward a one world government through annihilation or elimination of American Citizen status by use of the so-called 14th Amendment and its related laws.

This movement can be halted by the efforts of everyone to return to the status of American Citizen. By becoming an American Citizen and not a citizen of the United States you can get the federal government off your back and out of your billfold.

I want the original Constitution for the united States of America put back in force, as applied against the Federal government, and the States restored to their original status as Republics.

So, all you have to do is to study and determine your status, whether you are a "slave" and a second class citizen (commonly referred to as a "federal citizen or U.S. citizen) or an American Citizen referred to as a Sovereign Citizen.



Believe it or Not, under an American Citizen you have Rights, NOT PRIVILEGES!! You don’t have property tax, IRS, you get a third more in your pay check, you travel where ever you want in the country without the privilege of drivers license or license plates on your personal property and more...



THE TWO UNITED STATES



THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / THE FEDERAL UNITED STATES

Type of Government; Constitutional republic / Legislative democracy



Territory (venue); The union of 50 independent sovereign States, not including the District of Columbia, territories or enclaves. / The district of Columbia and all the territories and enclaves (American Samoa, Guam, Midway Island, Puerto Rico, Wake Island, etc.)



Capital; The union of the United States is the only country in the world with no national capital within its venue. Each sovereign State has its own capital. / Since June 1800, a "City of Washington" sits in the federal District of Columbia, which is exempt from all State influence and jurisdiction. The city is ruled by a federal Commission appointed by the President. It has no local legislature; the only legislative authority is Congress. It is the meeting place of Congress and is the seat of federal administration.



Created by; "We the People," free Preamble sovereign citizens / Article 1, Section 8, clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution.



Citizenry; Each State has rule over its own citizenry, made up of free Preamble persons: "We the People... and our Posterity." /The citizens of the district of Columbia, all the territories, enclaves and possessions, and all naturalized citizens (XIVth Amendment, Section 1).



Executive branch; President / President



Legislative branch; A Congress of the Republic consisting of representatives from the citizenry / A Congress of the Legislative Democracy the same persons.



Congress jurisdiction; The States only, not the citizenry of the States except under some form of Commercial Agreement / The citizenry of DC, the territories, enclaves, and possessions, naturalized citizens, and those who put themselves under the rule of federal regions.



Judicial jurisdiction; Law, equity (Article III courts) and admiralty / Colorable admiralty (called statutory), Article 1 legislative courts



Authorized currency; Real money, based on substance: gold and silver (Article 1, Section 10, clause 1) / Promises-to-pay money, based on bank credit: Federal Reserve Notes non redeemable in gold or silver (equitable paper involving Commercial Agreements under negotiable instrument law - later codified as Uniform Commercial Code (UCC))



Limitations; Many in the U.S. Constitution / None, except what are called Unconscionable Agreements under UCC.



Flag; Stars and strips without yellow fringe / Stars and stripes with yellow fringe.

State abbreviations; Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., etc. (With or without zip codes) / AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL SC, TX, etc. (with or without zip codes)..............


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...